Recent media coverage of rising gas prices has been criticized as a pattern of selective outrage, which has led to the public to view any temporary cost associated with national security as politically unacceptable. This has been seen as a move that erodes trust, weakens institutional resilience, and undermines the country's ability to absorb short-term strain in pursuit of long-term stability. The author argues that this shift in emphasis by the media is intended to guilt developed nations into abandoning “warmongering” oil and gas for “peaceful” renewable energy to combat a climate crisis. The article also notes that public support for national security decisions align with major institutions' signals of major institutions. The authors conclude that the media framing weakens public trust and encourages apprehension and support for popular actions that serve security interests.