The article suggests that CEOs are profiting from portraying AI as dangerous and potentially dangerous, while promoting it as a valuable asset that only a few companies can build it safely. This strategy is effective for fundraising but potentially frightening to consumers. Only 26% of voters now view AI positively, making it even less popular than ICE. Several AI CEOs fear an anti-AI wave could trigger a ban AI movement by 2028. However, they are divided on how to deliver a more positive message about AI's potential impact on society. Some argue that the warnings reflect genuine concern about its societal impact and that it could help win over investors and big business customers. The article also suggests that while the focus on promoting AI's safety could help investors and large business customers, it could also hinder corporate growth.